The changes look good to me; aside from the editorial comments about the MS licensing of MSPS, and the filename (should be "wd" until approved :) I think we are good to go...
I will fix the minutes tonight...
On Aug 17, 2011, at 3:33 PM, William Wagner wrote:
> In accord with the information in the minutes of the face-to-face Cloud Meeting minutes of 2 August (ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/cloud/minutes/cloud-f2f-minutes-20110802.pdf), I have revised the existing, approved Cloud Imaging WG charter and posted an interim draft.
>ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/cloud/wd/ch-cloud-charter-20110818-rev.pdf>ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/cloud/wd/ch-cloud-charter-20110818.docx>> I sought to make changes in a way consistent with the original. In the interests of using concall time effectively, I request that those who prefer different wording or abbreviations post their preferred version, and that discussion be focused on content. One issue that needs to be resolved is under comment W1. “Considering that Semantic Model V2 is not yet formalized, but represents the preferred model, what do we use as a reference? If the to be issued PJT, do we loose mapping to the SM elements related to printer description?”
>> Since the charter already separated out the print and multifunction document activity milestones, I made no changes to these other than the dates.
>> (I should also observe the minutes cited above have an incorrect title and date)
>> Bill Wagner
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean. _______________________________________________
> cloud mailing list
>cloud at pwg.org>https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...