[Cloud] Minutes posted from today's concall

[Cloud] Minutes posted from today's concall

[Cloud] Minutes posted from today's concall

William A Wagner wamwagner at comcast.net
Mon Jun 25 21:40:05 UTC 2012


Hi Randy,

Yes, this is the abstract model discussion. However, there were some who
felt that even at this level, association/registration should be dealt with
more thoroughly than merely stating that they must occur and must include
the transfer of specific information. The interim conclusion was to proceed
with the details of client job submission and print manager Job retrieval,
which we think we have a good handle on, and get the model document going so
that (particularly) the IPP group can proceed with binding specification
(which must deal with the specifics of
association/registration/authentication.) Regardless, I fully expect that
association/registration/authentication will come up again in the model
discussion. Please think about participating.

 

And I think the 10% value had to do with the effort of tailoring the
communication of defined printing association/registration information to
specific   registration/login  methods defined elsewhere

Bill Wagner.

 

From: cloud-bounces at pwg.org [mailto:cloud-bounces at pwg.org] On Behalf Of
Randy Turner
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 4:58 PM
To: cloud at pwg.org
Subject: Re: [Cloud] Minutes posted from today's concall

 

 

Hi Guys,

 

Read the minutes of today's con call.sounds like things are moving along.

 

I wasn't sure regarding the status of
association/registration/authentication (whatever you want to call it).

 

There was text in the minutes that the group was not going to tackle this --
is the idea not to tackle this at all? Or just that we're prioritizing our
efforts and trying to complete the core model before tackling the other
stuff ?

 

There was also a comment from the minutes that this would be a small amount
of code (10%) -- I think this may be a conservative estimate.  Anyway, we're
talking about completing the core "abstract" model, correct? So we're really
not talking about a concrete binding or implementation, so we're not talking
about code here.

 

Also, reaching across the abstract-to-concrete boundary, the minutes
mentioned something about XMPP -- I am working on implementations of cloud
services and XMPP seems like a good fit, not only because it has a very
robust publish/subscribe event model, but it can map into whatever AAA we
decide to use (multiple mappings exist).  There's a lot of really cool
extensions currently being worked on within the XMPP community (both IETF
and xmpp.org).  Also, XMPP could be used for registration/presence as well.
It's a nice communications substrate on which many apps could be mapped.

 

Thanks!

Randy

 

 

On Jun 25, 2012, at 1:40 PM, Michael Sweet wrote:





All,

 

I have posted the minutes from today's Cloud Imaging WG conference call to:

 

 
ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/cloud/minutes/cloud-concall-minutes-20120625.pdf

 

Our next conference call is July 16, 2012 at 3pm ET.

 

________________________________________________________________________

Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair

 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and 
dangerous content by  <http://www.mailscanner.info/> MailScanner, and is 
believed to be clean. 

_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list
cloud at pwg.org
https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud

 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and 
dangerous content by  <http://www.mailscanner.info/> MailScanner, and is 
believed to be clean. 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/cloud/attachments/20120625/936f2b55/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the cloud mailing list