On 2013-06-17, at 5:25 PM, Randy Turner <rturner at amalfisystems.com> wrote:
> I also wanted to make sure that the concept of registration ("I want to make my printer available to the cloud") is included -- I'm uneasy with some of the items we've talked about in the past being "out of scope" -- Without registration, nothing happens - there is no "service". We may need to review a couple of other "out-of-scope" items to make sure we're not specifying an abstract model that can't be instantiated by something "concrete" that actually works.
I think we are all now on the same page WRT registration. As Glen likes to call it, our focus will be on "device registration" and not on the specific security/ACL implementation details - that will be IDS's bailiwick. Thus, it will be possible to use the model with any security framework so long as it meets the basic requirements of the Semantic Model and whatever we come up with for requirements of Cloud.
> On a separate thread, I would like to "re-introduce" my proposal that we include a RESTful specification as one of our initial mapping documents for cloud imaging.
There was some discussion about how we might document implementing the PWG model with existing cloud solutions - perhaps that could be part of the RESTful binding specification (as an informative appendix)?
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.