Yes, that's what it seemed. In the future Minutes, I'll make the "find
other contacts" item the ONGOING one.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Randy Turner [mailto:rturner at amalfisystems.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 1:15 PM
> To: Farrell, Lee
> Cc: IDS at pwg.org> Subject: Re: IDS> Oct Face-to-face Action Items -- overlooked?
>> Hi Lee,
>> The "find other contacts" action item was the action item I
> was addressing at today's meeting. To summarize from the
> discussion earlier today, I think Symantec and Microsoft are
> willing to discuss NEA/TNC potential rollouts. I have
> "feelers" out to Cisco and Juniper as well and am waiting for
> a follow-up discussion. I will try and contact one or more
> of these folks at the IETF Plenary in Minneapolis.
>> On Nov 13, 2008, at 11:53 AM, Farrell, Lee wrote:
>> > Hello everyone,
> > After our teleconference today, I noted from the October
> face-to- face
> > Minutes that a few Action Items had not been transferred to the
> > November 6 teleconference Minutes -- and may have "slipped
> through the
> > cracks." It appears that some of the items about Microsoft
> may have
> > been enveloped in Dave's current set of questions to
> Microsoft in one
> > of his Action Items, but I'm not sure that they all were.
> > Also, I noted that the first Action Item (Randy's) that we
> > today had been CLOSED at that meeting. Today we identified it as
> > "ongoing", but I wonder if the third Action Item below might be the
> > more appropriate one to reference instead.
> > For future discussion and resolution, the items are:
> > ACTION: Ron Bergman will send an email to Mike Fenelon and Jerry
> > Thrasher to query the issue about how to get NAP attributes
> > with Microsoft.
> > ACTION: Dave Whitehead will attempt to obtain answers from
> > Microsoft to the following questions:
> > . Because there are multiple assessment protocols, is it
> > conceivable that multiple assessment protocols run simultaneously-
> > with each requiring independent (i.e., redundant) assessment?
> > . How does Microsoft envision the process for remediation?
> > . Does Microsoft have any plans for a gateway
> between NAP
> > and NEA?
> > ACTION: Randy Turner will try to find other contacts that would be
> > willing to work with the PWG to help deploy NEA health assessment.
> > (Juniper, Symantec, Cisco are suggested candidates.) Is someone
> > willing to sit down with the PWG and "have discussions"?
> > lee
> > ===========================
> > Lee Farrell
> > Canon Development Americas
> > 15975 Alton Parkway
> > Irvine, CA 92618-3731
> > (949) 932-3163 - voice
> > (949) 932-3520 - fax
> > lee.farrell at cda.canon.com> > ===========================
>>-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 3982 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.pwg.org/archives/ids/attachments/20081113/5cf8efd0/smime.bin