If I remember correctly, we wanted to present our attribute definitions to
some knowledgeable people within the NEA group and solicit feedback. We
knew the meeting was coming up and (I think) Randy said he was going and
would distribute our document. Basically, we were hoping for feedback
before our last call process ended.
David H. Whitehead
Lexmark International, Inc.
"Farrell, Lee" <Lee.Farrell at cda.canon.com>
Sent by: owner-ids at pwg.org
03/13/09 03:18 PM
<ids at pwg.org>
RE: IDS> FW: [Nea] Starting WGLC for PA-TNC and PB-TNC
At the IDS telecon yesterday, I just got the sense that there was
something that people were expecting from the NEA group. Maybe I
misunderstood. If the only item is approval of the PA-TNC (with the
attributes that were introduced), then I guess we're covered.
By "on their radar", I was looking for some agenda item referring to the
PWG or "printing". Perhaps I was being too explicit in my expectations
for their agenda.
From: Randy Turner [mailto:rturner at amalfisystems.com]
Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 12:05 PM
To: Farrell, Lee
Cc: ids at pwg.org
Subject: Re: IDS> FW: [Nea] Starting WGLC for PA-TNC and PB-TNC
If you have something to discuss, you can bring it up during the Agenda
bashing session - I think we've already made our proposal and portions of
it were introduced into the PA-TNC document in a previous draft - I'm not
sure what you mean by "on their radar".
On Mar 13, 2009, at 11:29 AM, Farrell, Lee wrote:
The NEA is holding their meeting on the 23rd, and the agenda is focusing
on a review of comments on the latest two draft documents:
Agenda for IETF 74 NEA WG meeting
Date: Monday, March 23, 2009
Time: 1300-1500 PDT (GMT-0700)
WG Charter: http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/nea-charter.html
WG Tools: http://tools.ietf.org/wg/nea
WG email: nea at ietf.org
Jabber & Minute scribes
1305 WG Status
1310 Discuss PB-TNC (recent changes and WGLC comments)
1400 Discuss PA-TNC (recent changes and WGLC comments)
1450 Review and Revise Milestones
What information exactly is it that the IDS group would like to have
discussed by and/or proposed to this group? It does not appear that they
have us on their radar, nor am I aware of any recent communication from
the IDS group to them.
From: nea-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:nea-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 1:29 PM
To: nea at ietf.org
Subject: [Nea] Starting WGLC for PA-TNC and PB-TNC
New versions of PA-TNC and PB-TNC have been posted.
These include all changes for which there was WG consensus. All open
issues are now closed. The new documents are available at these URLs:
Therefore, I am starting a Working Group Last Call on these documents.
Please review them and send any comments or questions to the nea at ietf.org
This Working Group Last Call will close at 5 PM EST on Friday, March 20,
We have chosen a two week WGLC period so that we can have all comments
received and ready to discuss before the NEA meeting at IETF 74. However,
if you feel that two weeks is not enough time, please email the NEA list
and we will consider an extension.
In any case, now is the time for all NEA WG participants to perform a
careful review of these specifications and raise any comments, concerns,
corrections, or questions that you may have. Please take the time to do
so before the end of WGLC.
Nea mailing list
Nea at ietf.orghttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nea
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...