I would be *interesting* to hear comments from a broader industry
collective, like NEA, but I think it would be a mistake to predicate
responses from the broader audience on completing an internal PWG or
IDS last call process.
To paraphrase, I wouldn't make responses from external review
necessary to complete last call processes.
To use Lee's phrase, from a NEA WG priority, we're probably not "on
their radar" at the moment - with TNC protocols already deployed,
there is some consideration being given to complete the initial NEA
docs as soon as possible, so that NEA can "catch up" to the market
into which TNC, Cisco, and NAP have already deployed.
I will ask Steve (Hanna) if he thinks it's appropriate at this
juncture to ask the NEA WG to provide comment on our documents.
On Mar 13, 2009, at 12:30 PM, Dave Whitehead wrote:
>> Lee, Randy,
>> If I remember correctly, we wanted to present our attribute
> definitions to some knowledgeable people within the NEA group and
> solicit feedback. We knew the meeting was coming up and (I think)
> Randy said he was going and would distribute our document.
> Basically, we were hoping for feedback before our last call process
>> David H. Whitehead
> Development Engineer
> Lexmark International, Inc.
>>> "Farrell, Lee" <Lee.Farrell at cda.canon.com>
> Sent by: owner-ids at pwg.org> 03/13/09 03:18 PM
> <ids at pwg.org>
> RE: IDS> FW: [Nea] Starting WGLC for PA-TNC and PB-TNC
>>>>> Hi Randy,
>> At the IDS telecon yesterday, I just got the sense that there was
> something that people were expecting from the NEA group. Maybe I
> misunderstood. If the only item is approval of the PA-TNC (with
> the attributes that were introduced), then I guess we're covered.
>> By "on their radar", I was looking for some agenda item referring
> to the PWG or "printing". Perhaps I was being too explicit in my
> expectations for their agenda.
>>> From: Randy Turner [mailto:rturner at amalfisystems.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 12:05 PM
> To: Farrell, Lee
> Cc: ids at pwg.org> Subject: Re: IDS> FW: [Nea] Starting WGLC for PA-TNC and PB-TNC
>>> Hi Lee,
>> If you have something to discuss, you can bring it up during the
> Agenda bashing session - I think we've already made our proposal
> and portions of it were introduced into the PA-TNC document in a
> previous draft - I'm not sure what you mean by "on their radar".
>>> On Mar 13, 2009, at 11:29 AM, Farrell, Lee wrote:
>> The NEA is holding their meeting on the 23rd, and the agenda is
> focusing on a review of comments on the latest two draft documents:
>> Agenda for IETF 74 NEA WG meeting
>> Date: Monday, March 23, 2009
> Time: 1300-1500 PDT (GMT-0700)
> WG Charter: http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/nea-charter.html> WG Tools: http://tools.ietf.org/wg/nea> WG email: nea at ietf.org>> 1300 Administrivia
> Blue Sheets
> Jabber & Minute scribes
> Agenda bashing
> 1305 WG Status
> 1310 Discuss PB-TNC (recent changes and WGLC comments)
> 1400 Discuss PA-TNC (recent changes and WGLC comments)
> 1450 Review and Revise Milestones
> 1500 Adjourn
>> What information exactly is it that the IDS group would like to
> have discussed by and/or proposed to this group? It does not
> appear that they have us on their radar, nor am I aware of any
> recent communication from the IDS group to them.
>> -----Original Message-----
> From: nea-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:nea-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf
> Of Stephen Hanna
> Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 1:29 PM
> To: nea at ietf.org> Subject: [Nea] Starting WGLC for PA-TNC and PB-TNC
>> New versions of PA-TNC and PB-TNC have been posted.
> These include all changes for which there was WG consensus. All
> open issues are now closed. The new documents are available at
> these URLs:
>>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-nea-pa-tnc-03.txt>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-nea-pb-tnc-03.txt>> Therefore, I am starting a Working Group Last Call on these
> documents. Please review them and send any comments or questions to
> the nea at ietf.org email list.
>> This Working Group Last Call will close at 5 PM EST on Friday,
> March 20, 2009.
>> We have chosen a two week WGLC period so that we can have all
> comments received and ready to discuss before the NEA meeting at
> IETF 74. However, if you feel that two weeks is not enough time,
> please email the NEA list and we will consider an extension.
>> In any case, now is the time for all NEA WG participants to perform
> a careful review of these specifications and raise any comments,
> concerns, corrections, or questions that you may have. Please take
> the time to do so before the end of WGLC.
> Nea mailing list
>Nea at ietf.org>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nea
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...