IDS> FW: [Nea] Starting WGLC for PA-TNC and PB-TNC

IDS> FW: [Nea] Starting WGLC for PA-TNC and PB-TNC

IDS> FW: [Nea] Starting WGLC for PA-TNC and PB-TNC

Randy Turner rturner at amalfisystems.com
Fri Mar 13 17:21:38 EDT 2009


Hi Dave,

I would be *interesting* to hear comments from a broader industry  
collective, like NEA, but I think it would be a mistake to predicate  
responses from the broader audience on completing an internal PWG or  
IDS last call process.

To paraphrase, I wouldn't make responses from external review  
necessary to complete last call processes.

To use Lee's phrase, from a NEA WG priority, we're probably not "on  
their radar" at the moment - with TNC protocols already deployed,  
there is some consideration being given to complete the initial NEA  
docs as soon as possible, so that NEA can "catch up" to the market  
into which TNC, Cisco, and NAP have already deployed.

I will ask Steve (Hanna) if he thinks it's appropriate at this  
juncture to ask the NEA WG to provide comment on our documents.

Randy


On Mar 13, 2009, at 12:30 PM, Dave Whitehead wrote:

>
> Lee, Randy,
>
> If I remember correctly, we wanted to present our attribute  
> definitions to some knowledgeable people within the NEA group and  
> solicit feedback.  We knew the meeting was coming up and (I think)  
> Randy said he was going and would distribute our document.   
> Basically, we were hoping for feedback before our last call process  
> ended.
>
> dhw
>
> David H. Whitehead
> Development Engineer
> Lexmark International, Inc.
> 859.825.4914
> davidatlexmarkdotcom
>
>
> "Farrell, Lee" <Lee.Farrell at cda.canon.com>
> Sent by: owner-ids at pwg.org
> 03/13/09 03:18 PM
>
> To
> <ids at pwg.org>
> cc
> Subject
> RE: IDS> FW: [Nea] Starting WGLC for PA-TNC and PB-TNC
>
>
>
>
> Hi Randy,
>
> At the IDS telecon yesterday, I just got the sense that  there was  
> something that people were expecting from the NEA group.  Maybe I   
> misunderstood.  If the only item is approval of the PA-TNC (with  
> the  attributes that were introduced), then I guess we're  covered.
>
> By "on their radar", I was looking for some agenda item  referring  
> to the PWG or "printing".    Perhaps I was being too  explicit in my  
> expectations for their agenda.
>
> lee
>
>
> From: Randy Turner  [mailto:rturner at amalfisystems.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009  12:05 PM
> To: Farrell, Lee
> Cc:  ids at pwg.org
> Subject: Re: IDS> FW: [Nea] Starting WGLC for PA-TNC  and PB-TNC
>
>
> Hi Lee,
>
> If you have something to discuss, you can bring it up during the  
> Agenda  bashing session  - I think we've already made our proposal  
> and portions  of it were introduced into the PA-TNC document in a  
> previous draft - I'm not  sure what you mean by "on their radar".
>
> Randy
>
>
> On Mar 13, 2009, at 11:29 AM, Farrell, Lee wrote:
>
> The NEA is holding their  meeting on the 23rd, and the agenda is  
> focusing on a review of comments on the latest  two draft documents:
>
> Agenda for IETF 74 NEA  WG meeting
> =================================
>
> Date: Monday, March  23, 2009
> Time: 1300-1500 PDT (GMT-0700)
> WG Charter: http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/nea-charter.html
> WG  Tools: http://tools.ietf.org/wg/nea
> WG  email: nea at ietf.org
>
> 1300  Administrivia
>          Blue  Sheets
>          Jabber &  Minute scribes
>          Agenda  bashing
> 1305 WG Status
> 1310 Discuss PB-TNC (recent changes and WGLC  comments)
>        http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-nea-pb- 
> tnc-03.txt
> 1400 Discuss PA-TNC (recent changes and WGLC  comments)
>        http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-nea-pa- 
> tnc-03.txt
> 1450 Review and Revise Milestones
> 1500 Adjourn
>
> What information exactly is it  that the IDS group would like to  
> have discussed by and/or proposed to this  group?  It does not  
> appear that they have us on their radar, nor am I  aware of any  
> recent communication from the IDS group to  them.
>
> lee
>
> -----Original  Message-----
> From: nea-bounces at ietf.org  [mailto:nea-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf  
> Of Stephen  Hanna
> Sent:  Friday, March 06, 2009 1:29 PM
> To: nea at ietf.org
> Subject: [Nea] Starting WGLC for PA-TNC  and PB-TNC
>
> New versions of PA-TNC and  PB-TNC have been posted.
> These include all changes for which there was WG consensus. All  
> open  issues are now closed. The new documents are available at  
> these  URLs:
>
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-nea-pa-tnc-03.txt
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-nea-pb-tnc-03.txt
>
> Therefore, I am starting a  Working Group Last Call on these  
> documents. Please review them and send any  comments or questions to  
> the nea at ietf.org  email list.
>
> This Working Group Last Call  will close at 5 PM EST on Friday,  
> March 20, 2009.
>
> We have chosen a two week WGLC  period so that we can have all  
> comments received and ready to discuss before  the NEA meeting at  
> IETF 74. However, if you feel that two weeks is not  enough time,  
> please email the NEA list and we will consider an  extension.
>
> In any case, now is the time for  all NEA WG participants to perform  
> a careful review of these specifications  and raise any comments,  
> concerns, corrections, or questions that you may  have. Please take  
> the time to do so before the end of  WGLC.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Steve
> _______________________________________________
> Nea mailing list
> Nea at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nea

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.pwg.org/archives/ids/attachments/20090313/c29e44ba/attachment.html


More information about the Ids mailing list