Hi Dave & List,
Time permitting, I would also like to see if there is any opportunity
for incorporating standard remediation methods
for "configuration" of device attributes that conflict with site
security policy....
Randy
On Jul 20, 2009, at 9:11 AM, Dave Whitehead wrote:
>> Just a reminder of today's conference call ...
>> dhw
>> David H. Whitehead
> Development Engineer
> Lexmark International, Inc.
> 859.825.4914
> davidatlexmarkdotcom
> dhwatinsightbbdotcom
>> ==========================================================
> Call-in toll-free number (US/Canada): 1-866-469-3239
>> Call-in toll number (US/Canada): 1-650-429-3300
>> Call-in toll number (US/Canada): 1-408-856-9570
>> Attendee access code: (by request only)
>>> IDS CC Agenda
> July 20, 2009
>> Assign Scribe
> PWG IP Statement
> Review Action Items
> IDS-NAP Meeting Agenda
> Assign Scribe
> PWG IP Statement
> Introductions
> Short overview of NAP (Microsoft)
> How the IDS group proposes to map attributes to the NAP
> protocol (IDS)
> Discuss the alignment of attributes
> Discuss questions to the NAP team
> Discuss remote attestation – how to make sure the remote
> device does not lie about its statement of health (without a TPM,
> how reliable can it be?) Is this an important concern of the NAP team?
> Review the questions previously submitted to the NAP team in
> April. Expand on the answers as possible.
> Other Announcements
> Adjourn
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean. _______________________________________________
> ids mailing list
>ids at pwg.org>https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ids>
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ids/attachments/20090720/de55f1d7/attachment-0001.html>