Are there any documents on the internet that you guys know about that
describe existing attack vectors on PSTN/Analog Fax lines?
On Aug 13, 2009, at 6:44 PM, Ira McDonald wrote:
> Hi Randy,
>> It's not that we don't care about IFax.
>> It's that all forms of Internet Fax have protocols and IP
> ports that would be reported in HCD_Firewall_Setting.
>> But many businesses and government agencies ALSO
> want to close the "back door" of PSTN Fax.
> - Ira
>> Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
> Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
> Blue Roof Music/High North Inc
> email: blueroofmusic at gmail.com> winter:
> 579 Park Place Saline, MI 48176
> PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839
>>>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Randy Turner<rturner at amalfisystems.com> > wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>>> When we came up with this attribute, we include PSTN in the name,
>> means we only care about PSTN fax, and not internet-fax options
>> such as T.38
>> or other fully capable iFax features.
>> Did we mean to do this? We only care about PSTN? Which I assume to
>> analog fax?
>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
>> believed to be clean.
>> ids mailing list
>>ids at pwg.org>>https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ids>>>
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.