I like the flow of this version much better. Some quick notes:
1. Page 2 - Remediation: "In most NAC systems" instead of "Is most NAC systems"?
2. Page 3 - Maybe make Network Access Protocols content into three non-bulleted paragraphs, and then list the vendors for each protocol rather than separating them?
On Oct 29, 2010, at 5:52 PM, Murdock, Joe wrote:
> The next draft of the MPSA article has been posted. Let me know if I on the right track..
>>ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ids/white/MPSA-Hardcopy-Security-Article-draft-3.docx>ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ids/white/MPSA-Hardcopy-Security-Article-draft-3.pdf>> ---------------------------------------
> Joe Murdock
> Principal Engineer and Researcher
> Co-Chair IEEE/ISTO Printer Working Group Imaging Device Security
> Sharp Labs of America
> 5750 NW Pacific Rim Blvd
> Camas, WA 98607
> (360) 817-7542
>jmurdock at sharplabs.com>>> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean. _______________________________________________
> ids mailing list
>ids at pwg.org>https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ids
________________________________________________________________________
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ids/attachments/20101029/acecdc18/attachment-0001.html>