Subject: [IDS] Conference call reminder: Monday April 1, 2013
* Agenda bashing
* Review Minutes of last conference call
* Review Action Item status
* Formal vote status
8 - Votes for Log Spec
7 - Attribute spec
8 - Nap Spec
Latest Spec on S-CAP can be found at
link to the October 2012 TCG TNC SCAP
Messages for IF-M:
Action Item #
Original Due date
Planned date of completion
Actual date of completion
[ -> others to
do the same]
Look at the list of REQUIRED attributes in Section 5.1, lines 594-600 of
the HCD-TNC Binding spec that could be omitted when using the [PT-EAP]
posture transport protocol and provide any suggested changes in the list
to Ira McDonald before the next IDS Face-to-Face Meeting.
1/21/13: Will be completed as part of the Feb 7 IDS Face-to-Face Meeting
2/7/13: Still not started.
3/18/13: Work on this has begun
Monitor the TCG's SCAP Mapping spec for implementation in the IDS specs
1/21/13:Action is on-going
2/7/13: Still on-going. IDS WG to review the latest spec draft that has
just been made available.
3/18/13: Will require a face-to-face meeting to get this activity going
Make the changes agreed upon at the 2/7/13 IDS Face-to-Face Meeting to
the HCD-TNC Binding Spec.
3/18: Awaiting [PT-EAP] Spec completion
Send out to the PWG membership an announcement of the PWG final vote for
the PWG-LOG, HCDE-ATTR and HCD-NAP specs once the three specs have been
updated to address the LCRC comments and any comments made at today's
Initial announcement sent out. Will have to send out another
announcement because we do not have enough votes yet to approve the
ITEMS ON HOLD APPEAR BELOW:
PWG will contact Symantec (when appropriate) to encourage discussion
with the PWG about a SHV.
No longer blocked waiting for AI #32 so we can send market rationale to
Symantec. Need a volunteer to take over on this task.
Ron Nevo will take this task.
PWG will investigate Symantec's products and their method(s) to
"remediate noncompliant endpoints."
Ron Nevo will take over this activity. Randy will pass on his contacts
Symantec wants an NDA, but PWG cannot do an NDA; will do a generic
version; should we invite Symantec to a PWG IDS teleconference? Need a
volunteer to take over on this task.
Ron nevo will take over this task. Need to indicate to Symantec that we
really wdon;t need too much proprietary information from them, but want
to give them our information. Can we get Symantec to attend the April
meeting in Cupertino?
Joe Murdock and Ira McDonald
Create a first draft SCCM binding spec based on the NAP binding spec
MS is releasing R3 of SCCM and also a beta of "R-next", while at the
same time adding power management; WIMS group may also be interested. On
hold due to priorities.
Bill Wagner, Brian Smithson
Data security article: Bill to draft, Brian to finish
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...