I'm including the 4 documents that Graham Klyne pointed us to on W3C
Composite Capabilities/Preference Profiles in the printed set of documents
for our QUALDOCS meeting.
Tom
-----Original Message-----
From: Graham Klyne [mailto:GK at dial.pipex.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2000 1:20 AM
To: Manros, Carl-Uno B
Subject: Re: Encoding for CONNEG
At 12:17 PM 8/29/00 -0700, you wrote:
>Graham,
>>Back in Pittsburgh we spoke briefly about the possible use of CONNEG
>semantics in QUALDOCS. You suggested to take a look an a W3C project that
>could offer a suitable encoding for the CONNEC semantics. Could you please
>give me a somewhat more exact pointer to the W3C document you had in mind?
>>Thankful for a quick answer as we will hold our first QUALDOCS meeting in
>the PWG in two weeks time, and I would like to make sure we take a look at
>the W3C document beforehand.
See: http://www.w3.org/Mobile/CCPP/
(The work is still fairly rough, IMO, but there's an XML-based framework
for capability description. CONNEG-style compositions are not provided for
yet, but could be added either as CC/PP extensions or as generic RDF logic
extensions. Michael Mealling is working on a proposal that will allow tags
from the conneg registry to be embedded in URI space as URNs.)
#g
------------
Graham Klyne
(GK at ACM.ORG)