IPP> REQ - Issues with the 2/17 Requirements Scenarios

IPP> REQ - Issues with the 2/17 Requirements Scenarios

IPP> REQ - Issues with the 2/17 Requirements Scenarios

Carl-Uno Manros manros at mindspring.com
Wed Mar 12 02:18:31 EST 1997


A few comments to Steve's comments.


Carl-Uno


At 09:55 PM 3/11/97 PST, Stephen Zilles wrote:


>I thought that handling driver download was not a V1.0 feature


CBM> It is certainly not on Version 1.0


>I am not sure why there are a number of different scenarios for the
>failure of a print job: 8.8, 8.10, 8.12, 8.18. Should not these all be
>one scenario (which could talk about different return information)?


CBM> Useful simplification


>I think that server pull for long jobs (8.17) is out of scope for V1.0
>(and that we should resolve whether the protocol needs long job support
>for push in 1.0)  I think there is a need for getting a job ID before
>any documents are submitted to allow status monitoring which
>transmission of data is going on. I an not convinced that checkpoint
>restart is needed for V1.0


CBM> I would be willing to change 8.17 to a normal push version, but is keen to 
CBM> keep support for long jobs in some form.


>I do not think that 8.19 (referenced resources) is a requirement for
>V1.0


CBM> I agree


CBM> I would also like to support the suggestion from Bob to take ut the
chunking 
CBM> parts from the scenarios, I have come to believe that this is a pure
protocol 
CBM> issue.


End of comments (it is only 11.15 pm here)


Carl-Uno



More information about the Ipp mailing list