IPP>REQ comments on latest requirements

IPP>REQ comments on latest requirements

IPP>REQ comments on latest requirements

Robert Herriot Robert.Herriot at Eng.Sun.COM
Wed Mar 19 15:55:57 EST 1997


The important point here is that we cannot have what looks like a response
to a print operation and then send more data.




> From don at lexmark.com Wed Mar 19 05:12:19 1997
> >page 37: section 8.14.
> >
> >  I think we agreed that the last request "Here is last part of the document to
> >   print" and response would be deleted and replaced with words saying that 
> the job
> >   resumed printing.
> 
> I struggled with this one because in the scenario the printer is not capable of 
> spooling.  I think this case simply indicates that an error occurred while there
> was still data to be sent to this printer and once the problem was fixed, 
> printing
> resumed and more print data was sent.  The cases we discussed where 
> there was language like this were all chunking cases.This is not a chunking 
> case but rather a non-spooling printer case.  I think I should leave it as it 
> stands.  
>   
>  
> Don
> 



More information about the Ipp mailing list