> 188.8.131.52 successful-attribute-ignored (IPP)
> Is this really necessary, especially if the returned attributes indicate
> which are unsupported. This is a case of half-full versus half-empty.
I thought this was necessary since a Printer could implement the "should"
best-effort case and simple ignore some attributes that were not supported.
It still prints, the printer is just trying to tell the client some possibly
>> 184.108.40.206 server-error-write-fault (IPP)
>> I would expect the client to block on a write and that it wouldn't
> clear until the server got enough space to write the data.
But there are cases where the Printer experiences a disk-full condition but
still has enough buffer space to return a response packet. I wouldn't get
rid of it.
>> 220.127.116.11 server-error-too-many-documents-in-job (IPP)
>> With the changes from last week where all Printers support PrintJob
> (1 document per job) and some support CreateJob/SendJobData (1 or
> more documents per job), this message isn't needed. The error
> server-error-operation-not-implemented handles this problem instead.
Is there a case where the Printer supports both Print-Job and
Create-Job/Send-Job-Data but for some reason has an implementation limit of
N documents per job? It would be helpful to have this error code for that
case. We have no way (nor do I propose) to query the printer to find out
how many multiple docs per job it supports.