At 05:21 PM 5/21/97 PDT, Larry Masinter wrote:
LM> I would assume that "print-job" was a good name for
LM> what it is that you're sending in submitting a job.
>>>>> "CM" == Carl-Uno Manros <cmanros at cp10.es.xerox.com> writes:
CM> One of the parameters for application/ipp is intended to be the actual
CM> operation that you want the IPP server to execute. [...] So I
CM> think we are looking for for something more generic than
CM> I see the "application/ipp" as a top level label for a number of related
CM> operation requests and responses [...]
I agree with Larrys original comment that 'application/ipp' is both
redundant and not very descriptive. From your response, I would
agree that 'application/print-operation' would be much better.
Scott Lawrence EmWeb Embedded Server <lawrence at agranat.com>
Agranat Systems, Inc. Engineering http://www.agranat.com/