JMP> Re: IPP> MOD JobState suggestion

JMP> Re: IPP> MOD JobState suggestion

JMP> Re: IPP> MOD JobState suggestion

Ron Bergman rbergma at dpc.com
Thu Jun 5 21:12:12 EDT 1997


Tom,


Looks good.  Any objections from anyone else?


	Ron Bergman




On Thu, 5 Jun 1997, Tom Hastings wrote:


> Sounds simpler.  So how is this for JMP:
> 
> JmJobStateTC ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
> STATUS      current
> DESCRIPTION
> "The current state of the job (pending, processing, completed, etc.).
> 
> The following figure shows the normal job state transitions:
> 
>                                                     +--> canceled(7)
>                                                    /
>     +---> pending(3) --------> processing(5) -----+----> completed(9)
>     |        ^                      ^              \
> --->+        |                      |               +--> aborted(8)
>     |        v                      v              /
>     +---> pendingHeld(4)   processingStopped(6) --+
> 
>         <--------------- active -----------------> <--- in-active --->
>                 Figure 4 - Normal Job State Transitions
> 
> Normally a job progresses only from left to right.  Other state transitions
> are unlikely, but are not forbidden.  The canceled state can be entered from
> the pending, pendingHeld, processing, or processingStopped states."
> 
> -- This is a type 2 enumeration.  See Section 7.1 on page 25.
> SYNTAX      INTEGER {
> other(1),		
> 
> 
> At 10:05 06/05/97 PDT, Ron Bergman wrote:
> >Tom,
> >
> >I agree that you new revised figure is correct.  But it has so 
> >many lines and lines crossing that I doubt it is useful.
> >
> >I propose that we keep the original figure, but show the two paths
> >to "Aborted", with the added text:
> >
> >"The Canceled state can be entered from the Pending, Pending-Held, 
> >Processing, or Processing-Stopped states."
> >
> >
> >	Ron Bergman
> >	Dataproducts Corp.
> >
> >



More information about the Ipp mailing list