Randy and other looking at improving our text on security,
In our earlier discussions, we have loosely spoken about "secure" and
"insecure" URIs for IPP etc. I suggest that we need to come up with better
terms for the actual text in the draft documents, such as:
HTTP URI: TLS URI:
Basic security Enhanced security
Simple security Advanced security
What I want to avoid is to call the first case "insecure" or "non-secure"
as it contains the case where RFC 2069 is used, which by many is considered
to be enough of security for a particular IPP printer.
Principal Engineer - Advanced Printing Standards - Xerox Corporation
701 S. Aviation Blvd., El Segundo, CA, M/S: ESAE-231
Phone +1-310-333 8273, Fax +1-310-333 5514
Email: manros at cp10.es.xerox.com