IPP> MOD - Updated Section 15.3 from Bob, Scott, Roger,

IPP> MOD - Updated Section 15.3 from Bob, Scott, Roger,

IPP> MOD - Updated Section 15.3 from Bob, Scott, Roger,

Roger K Debry rdebry at us.ibm.com
Wed Dec 10 08:32:44 EST 1997


I'd prefer to leave it in.


Roger K deBry
Senior Technical Staff Member
Architecture and Technology
IBM Printing Systems
email: rdebry at us.ibm.com
phone: 1-303-924-4080




---------------------- Forwarded by Roger K Debry/Boulder/IBM on 12/10/=
97 06:32
AM ---------------------------


        ipp-owner at pwg.org
        12/09/97 10:43 PM
Please respond to ipp-owner at pwg.org @ internet


To: Carl Kugler/Boulder/IBM at ibmus, ipp at pwg.org @ internet
cc:
Subject: Re: IPP> MOD - Updated Section 15.3 from Bob, Scott, Roger,


Carl has suggested that there might not be a need Validate-Job.


I haven't seen any public responses?  Does silence mean AGREE or DISAGR=
EE?
Or is
everyone like me - don't know yet.


Carl also asks:


>>> Carl Kugler <kugler at us.ibm.com> 12/05 9:26 AM >>>
> Side question:  does an IPP error response have an HTTP status code o=
f
> Successful "200 OK"?


The answer to this is YES.  The HTTP POST worked fine.  The
"application/ipp" body within
the POST had the error.
































=



More information about the Ipp mailing list