I also prefer printer-secure-uri....
Randy
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Xavier D. Riley [SMTP:xriley at cp10.es.xerox.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 1997 10:36 AM
> To: ipp at pwg.org> Cc: xriley at cp10.es.xerox.com> Subject: Re: IPP> MOD - URGENT: Ok to call 2nd printer uri:
> "printer-map-uri"?
>> Tom,
> Any name is OK with me. Are you aware that mutual
> authentication and privacy are not mandatory in TLS.
> It is optional based on the cipher suite used.
>> Will the user see this name?
>> I prefer "printer-tls-uri" or "printer-secure-uri".
>> --Xavier
>> At 09:15 AM 12/17/97 PST, Tom Hastings wrote:
> >In Washington and before, there has been discussion that calling
> >the second uri, "printer-secure-uri" makes it sound like the first
> >"printer-uri" is not secure. So we've been searching for a better
> >term.
> >
> >Scott and Steve came up with the term (drum roll):
> >
> > "Mutual Authentication and Privacy (MAP).
> >
> >So ok to call the second uri Printer attribute: "printer-map-uri"?
> >
> >It will be put right after the first uri: "printer-uri" secion
> >4.4.2 in the Model document.
> >
> >SEND COMMENTS TO DL, SO WE CAN FORWARD THE INTERNET-DRAFT THIS WEEK
> >TO THE IESG.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Tom
> >
> >
> >
>> ______________________________________________________________________
> Xavier Riley
> Xerox Corp.
> Corp. Research & Tech. Voice: 310-333-8329 / 8*823-8329
> 701 S. Aviation Blvd ESAE-231 Fax: 310-333-6618 / 8*823-6618
> El Segundo, California 90245 Email: xriley at cp10.es.xerox.com> ______________________________________________________________________