What is the process for confirming consensus after substantial changes have
been made to a standard? In the IEEE and other recognized standards
bodies, if non-editoral changes are made, the final version is
re-ballotted. Considering the substantial changes made since the WG had
consensus in and shortly after the January meeting in Maui, once we have
updated all the document with what we believe to be the last changes (i.e.
before IESG approval), I believe we should make sure the WG is still in
consensus.
Thoughts??
**********************************************
* Don Wright don at lexmark.com *
* Product Manager, Strategic Alliances *
* Lexmark International *
* 740 New Circle Rd *
* Lexington, Ky 40550 *
* 606-232-4808 (phone) 606-232-6740 (fax) *
**********************************************