IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme

IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme

Roger K Debry rdebry at us.ibm.com
Thu Jul 16 14:25:54 EDT 1998


I suppose in Don's case it depends on what he means by "administratively set".
It almost sounded
like port 80 was hard wired in. Can an adminsitrator choose to use a different
port Don?

Roger K deBry
Senior Technical Staff Member
Architecture and Technology
IBM Printing Systems
email: rdebry at us.ibm.com
phone: 1-303-924-4080



owner-ipp at pwg.org on 07/16/98 12:12:08 PM
Please respond to owner-ipp at pwg.org
To: Carl Kugler/Boulder/IBM at ibmus
cc: ipp at pwg.org
Subject: Re: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme


I believe that if a product offers compliant operation--but also
offers configuration options to disable compliant operation--that
the product is still considered compliant.

Letting the customer do what the CUSTOMER wants should be ok, right?

 ...jay

----------------------------------------------------------------------
--  JK Martin               |  Email:   jkm at underscore.com          --
--  Underscore, Inc.        |  Voice:   (603) 889-7000              --
--  41C Sagamore Park Road  |  Fax:     (603) 889-2699              --
--  Hudson, NH 03051-4915   |  Web:     http://www.underscore.com   --
----------------------------------------------------------------------


Carl Kugler wrote:
>
> Carl:
> >
> > The implementation MUST support port 631 however, mine is administratively
> > set to only OPERATE on port 80.  The code is compliant.
> >
> > Don
> >
> >
> Hmmm... I think we need some clarification in the wording here, because I
think it's ambiguous as it stands.  Here's another quote:  "IPP server
implementations MUST offer IPP services using HTTP over the IANA assigned Well
Known Port 631 (the IPP default port). IPP server implementations may support
other ports, in addition to this port."
>
> So you read "suport" and "offer IPP services" to mean "can be configured to
listen on" rather than "is required to listen on"?
>
>     -Carl
>
> >
> >
> > "Carl Kugler" <kugler%us.ibm.com at interlock.lexmark.com> on 07/16/98
> > 12:18:26 PM
> >
> > To:   ipp%pwg.org at interlock.lexmark.com
> > cc:    (bcc: Don Wright)
> > bcc:  Don Wright
> > Subject:  RE: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ...
> > > Sorry Larry, but my printer isn't on the default IPP port of 631.  Mine
> > is
> > > on 80 so my URL is exactly right.  Not all implementations MUST be on
> > 631.
> > ...
> > That's not how I read ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/new_PRO/ipp-pro-980630
> >
> > It says "It is REQUIRED that a printer implementation support HTTP over the
> > IANA assigned Well Known Port 631...".  Therefore, a conforming
> > implementation MUST be on 631, although it might also be on some other port
> > simultaneously.
> >
> > -----
> > Original Message: http://www.findmail.com/list/ipp/?start=4106
> > Start a FREE email list at http://www.FindMail.com/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> -----
> Original Message: http://www.findmail.com/list/ipp/?start=4138
> Start a FREE email list at http://www.FindMail.com/






More information about the Ipp mailing list