IPP> Future IPP security mechanisms

IPP> Future IPP security mechanisms

IPP> Future IPP security mechanisms

Randy Turner rturner at sharplabs.com
Wed Nov 4 12:53:29 EST 1998


Now that I think about it, I might not make it to Tucson, so it would be
better for me to have something more concrete for San Diego.

Randy



Manros, Carl-Uno B" wrote:

> Randy,
>
> I expect that we could spend some time on this towards end of the Tucson
> meeting, otherwise in San Diego. Can you be prepared to give us an
> overview and refresher about SASL to get us warm?
>
> Carl-Uno
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Randy Turner [mailto:rturner at sharplabs.com]
> > Sent: Monday, November 02, 1998 11:54 AM
> > To: ipp at pwg.org
> > Subject: IPP> Future IPP security mechanisms
> >
> >
> >
> > Concerning our discussions about what IPP v1.1 (or later) will consist
> > of, I would like the group to re-address the idea of security
> > and SASL.
> >
> > To converge on a single port number for security, I think
> > SASL provides
> > a very convenient method for doing this. With the publication of
> > RFC 2245 regarding an "anonymous" SASL profile, I think we
> > can do a much
> > better job at umambiguously specifying how security is enabled or
> > disabled. I'm also trying to remove the burden on related SLP and LDAP
> > schemas regarding secure and non-secure URLs.
> >
> > If we are willing to discuss this further,  I would like to add it to
> > the agenda of either the Tucson or San Diego meetings.
> >
> > (?)
> >
> > Randy
> >
> >
> >
> >




More information about the Ipp mailing list