IPP> Revised SLP 'printer:' template for comments

IPP> Revised SLP 'printer:' template for comments

IPP> Revised SLP 'printer:' template for comments

Robert Herriot robert.herriot at Eng.Sun.COM
Mon Jan 4 19:37:53 EST 1999


At our Tucson meeting, the IPP group agreed with James Kempf that there 
should be a separate SLP entry for each URI and that the URI associated with 
the entry would be the printer's URI.  Ira, I know that you disagreed with 
this direction.

If we stay with this decision, it implies to me that there is 
   a)  no need for the 'printer-uri-supported' attribute in the template. It can
be 
        determined by finding all URI's containing a 'printer-name' with a
particular value.
   b)  'uri-security-supported' contains the security supported for the
associated URI and
        not for other URIs associated with a printer.
   c)  the complexity of two parallel attributes is eliminated.

Bob Herriot


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.pwg.org/archives/ipp/attachments/19990104/c700b10c/attachment-0001.html


More information about the Ipp mailing list