IPP> TES IPP Bake-Off 2 prioritized test list

IPP> TES IPP Bake-Off 2 prioritized test list

IPP> TES IPP Bake-Off 2 prioritized test list

Manros, Carl-Uno B cmanros at cp10.es.xerox.com
Tue Jan 12 18:17:41 EST 1999


Paul,

Our latest Internet-Draft is from November 16, 1998, which was presented in
the latest IETF meeting.
Look at the IPP web page if you do not know where it is.

We still need to add the backwards interworking rules with IPP/1.0, which
should be fairly obvious.

Carl-Uno

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Moore [mailto:paulmo at microsoft.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 1999 2:29 PM
> To: 'Manros, Carl-Uno B'; Zehler, Peter; IPP Discussion List (E-mail)
> Subject: RE: IPP> TES IPP Bake-Off 2 prioritized test list
> 
> 
> We dont even have an agreed proposal for IPP: , let alone a 
> draft spec - so
> how can we bake it off?
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Manros, Carl-Uno B [mailto:cmanros at cp10.es.xerox.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 1999 2:17 PM
> To: Paul Moore; Zehler, Peter; IPP Discussion List (E-mail)
> Subject: RE: IPP> TES IPP Bake-Off 2 prioritized test list
> 
> 
> Paul,
> 
> We are still working on getting the IPP URL Scheme into 
> IPP/1.1, aka IPP/NV,
> which is IPP/1.0 on the standards track. From an IETF 
> perspective, we have
> not
> yet delivered on our original charter.
> 
> Carl-Uno
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Paul Moore [mailto:paulmo at microsoft.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 1999 1:27 PM
> > To: 'Zehler, Peter'; IPP Discussion List (E-mail)
> > Subject: RE: IPP> TES IPP Bake-Off 2 prioritized test list
> > 
> > 
> > What ipp: scheme. I thought we postponed that to the next version.
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Zehler, Peter [mailto:Peter.Zehler at usa.xerox.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 1999 12:47 PM
> > To: IPP Discussion List (E-mail)
> > Subject: IPP> TES IPP Bake-Off 2 prioritized test list
> > 
> > 
> > All,
> > The priority of the test at the next IPP bake-Off have been 
> set.  Any
> > comments/objections/general complaints should be sent to the IPP DL.
> >  
> > I will be holding an IPP Bake-off2  teleconference Friday 
> > morning. (details
> > to follow)  The objective of the teleconference is to discuss the
> > prioritized test list.  We need to flesh out the content of 
> the tests
> > further.  The IPP Bake-Off Test plan will also be discussed.  
> > Specifically
> > the sections referenced in the prioritized list.
> > 
> > The comments from the teleconference will be incorporated and 
> > be presented
> > at the Maui IPP meeting.  Based on the input from the 
> > teleconference I will
> > try and get out a preliminary schedule for the Bake-Off.  
> > 
> > The prioritized list for testing at the IPP Bake-Off 2 are stored at
> > ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/new_TES/Bake-Off2-Priority-List.pdf
> > I have also included it below.
> > The Test Plan is available at
> > ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/new_TES/IPP-Test-Plan-990112.pdf
> > A redlined version is also available at
> > ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/new_TES/IPP-Test-Plan-990112-red.pdf
> > MS word versions of the documents are also available.  We 
> > will be using the
> > pdf file without redlining in the teleconference.
> > 
> > Pete
> > 
> > ______________________________________________________________
> > ______________
> > __________________
> > 
> > IPP Bake-Off 2 Prioritized Test List
> > Last updated 1/12/99 by Peter Zehler
> > 
> > 1.	Basic Connectivity/Print(All participants) 
> > Insure all IPP participants are up and connected.  Determine 
> > supporters of
> > Set1 operations.  Record interoperability of simple print 
> submission.
> > A) Complete table 4.1
> > B) Perform section 2.1.3 and complete table 4.1.3
> > C) Perform section 2.3 and complete table 4.4 or equivalent matrix
> >       (IPP scheme can be completed during this step)
> > 2.	Chunking (Participants that can send or receive chunked 
> > encoding)
> > Test the ability of IPP Printers to accept a chunked IPP 
> > request and IPP
> > Client to accept chunked responses.
> > A) Perform section 3.3 and complete table 4.15
> > 3.	Security (Participants that support Basic, Digest or 
> > SSL3 security)
> > Test the ability of IPP Clients and Printers to interoperate 
> > while various
> > security schemes are in effect.  The security schemes can be 
> > Basic, Digest,
> > SSL3, or TLS.  We will test only the ability of the Client 
> > and Printer to
> > complete an operation such as print-job or 
> > get-printer-attributes.  We will
> > not be testing the interactions of an authenticated user and his
> > capabilities in the IPP model.(e.g. one user being able to 
> > cancel another
> > user's job)
> > A) Perform any of the subsections of section 3.1 that apply 
> and record
> > results in a table similar to the one in section 4.13
> > 4.	NLO (all implementations)
> > Test natural language override conformance(NOTE: Update to test plan
> > required to specify the objective of the NLO test.  I assume 
> > that it will be
> > along the lines of the NLO Test Script that Xerox developed 
> > and circulated
> > last year)
> > A) ???
> > 5.	IPP Scheme - (implementations that support the "ipp://" scheme)
> > Test interoperability of Clients and Printers that support 
> > the IPP scheme.
> > (Note: this test may also be performed with a proxy between 
> > the Client and
> > Printer)
> > A) Perform section 2.3 and complete table 4.4 or equivalent matrix
> > 
> > 6.	Create Job/Send Document (implementations that support the
> > operations)
> > Test the interoperability of the create-job/send-document 
> > operations in
> > various implementations.
> > A) Perform section 3.8 and record results in section X. (See 
> > note on timeout
> > and multiple-document jobs)
> > 7.	Print by Reference (implementations that support the operations)
> > Test the interoperability of the create-job/send-uri and print-uri
> > operations in various implementations. 
> > A) Perform section 3.8 and record results in section X. (See 
> > note on timeout
> > and multiple-document jobs)
> > 8.	Charset - (All implementations)
> > Test charsets other than UTF-8.
> > A) Perform section 3.6
> > 9.	Hold/Release (implementations that support these operations)
> > Test the hold-job, release-job, pause-printer and 
> resume-printer more
> > rigorously than during the first Bake-Off.
> > A) Need to flesh out details
> > 10.	HTTP Version - (implementations that support HTTP 1.0 and 1.1)
> > Test the interoperability of  IPP requests/responses over  HTTP 1.0.
> > A) Perform section 3.4 and record in section 4.16
> > 11.	Spool/NoSpool - Modify test plan and scripts to accommodate
> > non-spooling printers
> > 12.	Doc Format Colored Attributes (printers that support)
> > Test the printer's capability to return attribute values 
> based on the
> > document format specified in the IPP request.
> > (Does anyone do this)
> > 13.	Language (All implementations)
> > Test multiple languages. (What do we want to do here)
> > A) Perform section 3.7
> > 
> > 
> > 				Peter Zehler
> > 				XEROX
> > 				Networked Products Business Unit
> > 				Email: Peter.Zehler at usa.xerox.com
> > 				Voice:    (716) 265-8755
> > 				FAX:      (716) 265-8792 
> > 				US Mail: Peter Zehler
> > 				        Xerox Corp.
> > 				        800 Phillips Rd.
> > 				        M/S 111-02J
> > 				        Webster NY, 14580-9701
> > 
> 



More information about the Ipp mailing list