I agree, I think this should be looked at together with other features for
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ipp at pwg.org [mailto:owner-ipp at pwg.org]On Behalf Of Larry
> Sent: Thursday, May 13, 1999 12:43 AM
> To: Hastings, Tom N; ipp
> Subject: RE: IPP> Brief minutes of IPP 5/12 telecon
>>> > 4. Larry Masinter's mail:
> > a. Need "job-recipient-name(name)" when different from the
> submitting user.
> > ACTION ITEM (Tom Hastings): propose such a single valued attribute for
> > inclusion in IPP/1.1.
>> I think this is hasty, and should be left out of IPP/1.1. I wasn't
> calling for changes to IPP/1.1, I just think that IPP/1.1 is good
> for printing, which it's designed to do, and it's not perfect
> for messaging or e-printing or ifaxing or ipp-ing, which it wasn't
> designed to do.
>> I think that 'sender and recipient identification' aren't as easy
> as adding attributes to the job.