IPP> Re: Notification Requirements document from the IPP WG - <http:// www. ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ipp-not-03.txt>

IPP> Re: Notification Requirements document from the IPP WG - <http:// www. ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ipp-not-03.txt>

IPP> Re: Notification Requirements document from the IPP WG - <http:// www. ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ipp-not-03.txt>

Manros, Carl-Uno B cmanros at cp10.es.xerox.com
Fri Aug 27 13:51:15 EDT 1999


Greg,

Good, my misunderstanding, it looks like we may be moving in the same
direction after all...

Carl-Uno

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg Hudson [mailto:ghudson at MIT.EDU]
> Sent: Friday, August 27, 1999 10:44 AM
> To: Manros, Carl-Uno B
> Cc: impp at iastate.edu; IETF-IPP
> Subject: Re: IPP> Re: Notification Requirements document from 
> the IPP WG
> - <http:// www. ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ipp-not-03.txt> 
> 
> 
> > One more comment on MIME. 
> 
> > Rather than defining your own MIME type, would it be possible to
> > allow a number of existing MIME types, which is where we are coming
> > from.
> 
> When did I mention "defining our own MIME type?"  That's not what the
> requirements document means by "based on MIME."
> 



More information about the Ipp mailing list