[IPP] ISSUE: Should JPS2 shorten "job-delay-output-until[-time]" to just "job-delay-until[-time]" to align with MFD (and PWG Semantic Model)?

[IPP] ISSUE: Should JPS2 shorten "job-delay-output-until[-time]" to just "job-delay-until[-time]" to align with MFD (and PWG Semantic Model)?

Tom Hastings tom.hastings at verizon.net
Mon Apr 19 06:12:34 UTC 2010


Peter,

 

ISSUE: Should we remove the "-output" from the name to align the names more
with the MFD spec (and PWG Semantic Mode)?

 

In other words:

"job-delay-until" 

instead of :

"job-delay-output-until"

 

and:

 

ISSUE: Should we remove the "-output" from the name to align the names more
with the MFD spec (and PWG Semantic Mode)?

 

In other words:

"job-delay-until-time" 

instead of :

"job-delay-output-until-time"

 

Tom

 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20100418/e08b0647/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the ipp mailing list