[IPP] RE: ISSUE: Should JPS2 shorten "job-delay-output-until[-time]" to just "job-delay-until[-time]" to align with MFD (and PWG Semantic Model)?

[IPP] RE: ISSUE: Should JPS2 shorten "job-delay-output-until[-time]" to just "job-delay-until[-time]" to align with MFD (and PWG Semantic Model)?

Ira McDonald blueroofmusic at gmail.com
Mon Apr 19 16:11:58 UTC 2010


Hi,

Agreed - we should keep "output" in the names, because
otherwise "delay" alone is far too ambiguous about its
behavior as a description.

Cheers,
- Ira

Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
Co-Chair - TCG Hardcopy WG
IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
Blue Roof Music/High North Inc
http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic
http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc
mailto:blueroofmusic at gmail.com
winter:
  579 Park Place  Saline, MI  48176
  734-944-0094
summer:
  PO Box 221  Grand Marais, MI 49839
  906-494-2434



On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 7:16 AM, Zehler, Peter <Peter.Zehler at xerox.com> wrote:
> Tom,
>
> The PWG Semantic Model schema uses JobDelayOutputUntil and
> JobDelayOutputUntilTime which aligns with the JSP2 specification.  (schema
> elements dropped the ‘-‘ and uppercased the following letter)  I prefer to
> have the schema track JPS2 and I think the JPS2 attribute name is more
> descriptive.  The MFD specification will synch up with JPS2 when it is in
> final form.
>
> Pete
>
>
>
>
>
> Peter Zehler
>
> Xerox Research Center Webster
> Email: Peter.Zehler at Xerox.com
> Voice: (585) 265-8755
> FAX: (585) 265-7441
> US Mail: Peter Zehler
> Xerox Corp.
> 800 Phillips Rd.
> M/S 128-25E
> Webster NY, 14580-9701
>
>
>
> From: Tom Hastings [mailto:tom.hastings at verizon.net]
> Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 2:13 AM
> To: Zehler, Peter
> Cc: ipp at pwg.org
> Subject: ISSUE: Should JPS2 shorten "job-delay-output-until[-time]" to just
> "job-delay-until[-time]" to align with MFD (and PWG Semantic Model)?
>
>
>
> Peter,
>
>
>
> ISSUE: Should we remove the "-output" from the name to align the names more
> with the MFD spec (and PWG Semantic Mode)?
>
>
>
> In other words:
>
> "job-delay-until"
>
> instead of :
>
> "job-delay-output-until"
>
>
>
> and:
>
>
>
> ISSUE: Should we remove the "-output" from the name to align the names more
> with the MFD spec (and PWG Semantic Mode)?
>
>
>
> In other words:
>
> "job-delay-until-time"
>
> instead of :
>
> "job-delay-output-until-time"
>
>
>
> Tom
>
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
> _______________________________________________
> ipp mailing list
> ipp at pwg.org
> https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp
>
>

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.




More information about the ipp mailing list