Hi Mike,
My two cents:
Define new job-images[-completed] attributes, to align
w/ SM.
Also, Copy Service (and possibly other future services)
have both images (input) and impressions (output) work
counters.
Of course, Scan/FaxIn/etc. need images work counters.
Cheers,
- Ira,
Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
Secretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG IPP WG
Chair - TCG Embedded Systems Hardcopy SG
IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
Blue Roof Music/High North Inc
http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusichttp://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc
mailto:blueroofmusic at gmail.com
Winter 579 Park Place Saline, MI 48176 734-944-0094
Summer PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839 906-494-2434
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 8:20 PM, Michael Sweet <msweet at apple.com> wrote:
> All,
>> As I continue to sift through the minutes from the October 2011 F2F, I saw
> that we decided to normatively reference the 5106.1 definition of
> impressions for IPP and the Semantic Model going forward.
>> However, for FaxOut (and potentially other IPP service bindings, should we
> do them) the existing job-impressions/-completed attributes would not
> apply. Section 7.1 of 5106.1 has the following to say about impressions:
>> The relationships in this section are common to all services that contain
> the associated counters. For example the relationship for Impression
> applies to Copy, EmailIn, FaxIn, NetworkFaxIn, Print and SystemTotals
> because “impressions” is applicable to these services The relationship for
> Impression does not apply to EmailOut, FaxOut, NetworkFaxOut, Scan or
> Transform because “impressions” is not applicable to these services.
>>> Presumably we should report and count images instead, however IPP has
> never defined image counter attributes (e.g. there are no
> job-images/-completed attributes).
>> Should I:
>> 1. Add new job-images and job-images-completed Job Description attributes
> for FaxOut. This would preserve a closer 1-to-1 mapping with the Semantic
> Model.
>> or:
>> 2. Redefine job-impressions and job-impressions-completed to be images for
> FaxOut and other image-based services. This would make FaxOut closer to
> Print from a Client perspective, and existing code to report progress or do
> accounting would work without changes.
>> Thoughts?
>> _________________________________________________________
> Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair
>>> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean.
>> _______________________________________________
> ipp mailing list
>ipp at pwg.org>https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp>>
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20111101/3c687ad7/attachment-0001.html>