i think I understand the compromise, although I would have worded 1b and 2b a little different
Clients MUST support either DNS-SD or WS-Discovery….
It's just a different use of a contraction
"…one of DNS-SD AND WS-Discovery" seemed to use an AND contraction which implied both - someone might inadvertently parse this in a way we didn't expect….although I got the gist of the compromise.
R.
On Aug 20, 2012, at 9:16 PM, William A Wagner wrote:
> I think this is a practical and reasonable compromise. From at least my perspective, this does not put an unreasonable additional burden on printers while making potentially easier for clients to achieve and claim compliance.
> Bill Wagner
>> From: ipp-bounces at pwg.org [mailto:ipp-bounces at pwg.org] On Behalf Of Michael Sweet
> Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 9:42 PM
> To: ipp at pwg.org> Subject: [IPP] IPP Everywhere and "The Great Compromise"
>> All,
>> We discussed the PWG Last Call comments received thus far at today's IPP WG conference call. Two of the comments concerned the client requirements to support DNS-SD for discovery and both PWG Raster and JPEG for document formats. After over an hour of spirited debate, the following "great compromise" was proposed to resolve the last call comments:
>> 1. Discovery:
>> a. Printers MUST support both DNS-SD and WS-Discovery (adds WS-Discovery)
> b. Clients MUST support at least one of DNS-SD and WS-Discovery (Clients can choose amongst the two required protocols)
>> 2. Document Formats:
>> a. Printers MUST support both JPEG and PWG Raster (no change)
> b. Clients MUST support at least one of JPEG and PWG Raster (relaxes conformance - previously a Client had to support both)
>> Please comment on the proposed changes.
>> _________________________________________________________
> Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair
>>> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean. _______________________________________________
> ipp mailing list
>ipp at pwg.org>https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20120820/a0e8bfde/attachment-0001.html>