Hi Mike,
I agree with replacing "coloring" with the standard "filtering" term.
I found coloring in a lot of minutes, but also couldn't find it in the
IETF or early PWG IPP specs.
Cheers,
- Ira (buried in TCG meetings this week)
Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
Secretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG IPP WG
Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG
Chair - TCG Embedded Systems Hardcopy SG
IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
Blue Roof Music/High North Inc
http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusichttp://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc
mailto:blueroofmusic at gmail.com
Winter 579 Park Place Saline, MI 48176 734-944-0094
Summer PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839 906-494-2434
Temporary Cabin *** 2012 only *** 906-494-2523
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Michael Sweet <msweet at apple.com> wrote:
> All,
>> I have gotten more feedback on the continued use of the term "Coloring" in
> IPP specifications, and the reference back to 2911 as the reason for
> continuing its confusing existence.
>> Thus far I have gone along with this reference - I remember us using the
> term when IPP/1.0 and 1.1 were being hammered out so naturally we must have
> used it in the spec, right? But when one of my colleagues actually went
> looking for the term being used in 2911 she couldn't find it. And then I
> went digging...
>> So, as far as I can tell, we have *never* used the term "coloring" in an
> IETF RFC for IPP. I also could not find the term used in ISO DPA. The
> only place we have used it is in IPP JPS3 (now published) and IPP
> Everywhere (pending posting for Formal Vote).
>> I also did a search of the mailing list archives and found several uses of
> the term, but I don't see it in any of the drafts (other than JPS3 and
> Everywhere)
>> So, can anyone point me to the origins of the term? Given the number of
> complaints about this in the past (even for JPS3), the obscure usage, and
> the apparent lack of precedent, I would prefer to use "filtering" (as
> requested on several occasions) instead of "coloring" in IPP Everywhere.
>> Thoughts?
>> __________________________________________________
> Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair
>>> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean.
>> _______________________________________________
> ipp mailing list
>ipp at pwg.org>https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp>>
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20121018/e111f568/attachment-0001.html>