[IPP] Apple has reviewed the IPP FaxOut specification and has comments

[IPP] Apple has reviewed the IPP FaxOut specification and has comments

[IPP] Apple has reviewed the IPP FaxOut specification and has comments

Ira McDonald blueroofmusic at gmail.com
Fri Jun 28 17:19:30 UTC 2013


Hi Daniel,

Perhaps we should add "fax-modem-dialing" as a state reason (for the
Service and the FaxModem subunit) - but it's a very short-lived state
to be capturing in printer-state-reasons.

It's similar to the original IPP/1.1 (RFC 2911) "connecting-to-device",
but that one's only intended for passing a whole Job to the output-device,
not just the Job data (i.e, the FaxOut document content).

BTW - I think we should NOT add "fax-modem-training", because it's
a *very* short-lived state.

Mike - we'll have to register this (and any other) new Printer MIB Alerts
w/ IANA for the Printer MIB TC (as well as in the IPP Registry).

Cheers,
- Ira


Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
Secretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG IPP WG
Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG
Chair - TCG Embedded Systems Hardcopy SG
IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
Blue Roof Music/High North Inc
http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic
http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc
mailto:blueroofmusic at gmail.com
Winter  579 Park Place  Saline, MI  48176  734-944-0094
Summer  PO Box 221  Grand Marais, MI 49839  906-494-2434



On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 8:58 PM, Manchala, Daniel <Daniel.Manchala at xerox.com
> wrote:

>  Mike,****
>
> ** **
>
> Yes, one of the states we would like to have is ‘fax-out-modem-dialing’ or
> ‘fax-modem-dialing’.****
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks,****
>
> Daniel.****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* ipp-bounces at pwg.org [mailto:ipp-bounces at pwg.org] *On Behalf Of *Michael
> Sweet
> *Sent:* Thursday, June 27, 2013 5:12 AM
> *To:* ipp at pwg.org
> *Subject:* [IPP] Apple has reviewed the IPP FaxOut specification and has
> comments****
>
> ** **
>
> Follow-up comments based on the feedback we have gotten so far:****
>
> ** **
>
> Section 8.2 does not mention that the 'fax-modem-xxx' keywords are defined
> in PWG 5107.3.****
>
> ** **
>
> Section 8.2 does not define the equivalent of the 'connecting-to-defice'
> value from "printer-state-reasons". Should we define keyword(s) to
> describe this and/or the following intermediate states: Dialing, Answered,
> Training, and Connected?****
>
> ** **
>
> Section 12.2 should not re-register PWG 5107.3 keyword values for
> "job-state-reasons".****
>
> ** **
>
> Section 13.1 is missing a reference to PWG 5107.3.****
>
> ** **
>
> _________________________________________________________****
>
> Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair****
>
> ** **
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean. ****
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
> _______________________________________________
> ipp mailing list
> ipp at pwg.org
> https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp
>
>

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20130628/4d583d99/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the ipp mailing list