[IPP] ERRATA: More PWG 5101.1 tables 5 and 7

[IPP] ERRATA: More PWG 5101.1 tables 5 and 7

[IPP] ERRATA: More PWG 5101.1 tables 5 and 7

Ira McDonald blueroofmusic at gmail.com
Thu Aug 15 14:24:28 UTC 2013


Hi Mike,

Agreed - preserving former duplicates as aliases is backward compatible.

Cheers,
- Ira


Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
Secretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG IPP WG
Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG
Chair - TCG Embedded Systems Hardcopy SG
IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
Blue Roof Music/High North Inc
http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic
http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc
mailto:blueroofmusic at gmail.com
Winter  579 Park Place  Saline, MI  48176  734-944-0094
Summer  PO Box 221  Grand Marais, MI 49839  906-494-2434



On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Michael Sweet <msweet at apple.com> wrote:

> All,
>
> Some more investigation with a new automated test suite based on the
> 5101.1 names yielded two more duplicates, these also being present in MSN1:
>
>     Postfix and ISO C6/C5 (114x229mm)
>     PRC10 and ISO C3 (324x458mm)
>
> I propose we drop Postfix and PRC10 from the standard self-describing
> names; they can still be aliases for the official names.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> _________________________________________________________
> Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair
>
> _______________________________________________
> ipp mailing list
> ipp at pwg.org
> https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20130815/82b60cce/attachment.html>


More information about the ipp mailing list