Smith,
Some comments inline below...
On Feb 28, 2014, at 12:33 AM, Kennedy, Smith (Wireless Architect) <smith.kennedy at hp.com> wrote:
> ...
> Section 4.2, Page 9:
>> Note: IPP Printers ought to be cautious about depending on URI
> lengths above 255 bytes, because some older IPP Client
> implementations might not properly support these lengths.
>> Should “ought” really rather be “SHOULD”?
IPP's URI type is pretty clearly defined with a maximum size of 1023 octets. I believe this came from the original "ipp" URI scheme (RFC 3510), so perhaps we can just remove this line since I am not aware of any IPP clients that support "ipps" with this limitation...
> ...
> I’ve marked up copy of the PDF draft, that I will send to Ira separately so I don’t spam everyone else. I don’t know if this feedback is “too late” but I thought I’d send it on anyway.
This is good and appropriate IETF LC feedback, thank you!
_________________________________________________________
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4881 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20140228/2e68656e/attachment.p7s>