BTW - The correct title of this document (as published) is:
"IPP over HTTPS Transport Binding and 'ipps' URI Scheme".
That is to say, it's a binding of IPP over a mandatory HTTPS
session (TCP connection, TLS connection, HTTP connection
in that order only).
Sorry for the long-standing incorrect email subject lines.
Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG
Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
Secretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG Internet Printing Protocol WG
IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
Blue Roof Music / High North Inc
mailto: blueroofmusic at gmail.com
Winter 579 Park Place Saline, MI 48176 734-944-0094
Summer PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839 906-494-2434
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic at gmail.com>wrote:
>> I've just posted another Internet-Draft of IPP over HTTP Transport
> Binding and
> 'ipps' URI Scheme to:
>>>ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/draft-mcdonald-ipps-uri-scheme-10-20140407.txt> - plaintext Internet-Draft format (warning - contains explicit formfeed
>>>ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/draft-mcdonald-ipps-uri-scheme-10-20140407.pdf> - PDF of plaintext w/ line numbers (review *this* one)
>> This document has already been accepted and posted to the IETF I-D
>> This document is parallel to, but does not update or obsolete, RFC 3510.
>> This version has *minor* editorial changes since the previous version -
> based on
> IPP WG review on 31 March 2014.
> - Ira
>> Change History
>> 7 April 2014 - draft-mcdonald-ipps-uri-scheme-11.txt
> Global - revised all references to section 4.2 and section 4.3, to
> add parenthetic (syntax) and (port) respectively, per IEEE-ISTO PWG
> IPP WG review.
>> Editorial - Revised section 4.2 Syntax of 'ipps' URI Scheme, to
> correct two typos (extra words) in section 4.3 references, per
> IEEE-ISTO PWG IPP WG review.
>> Editorial - Revised section 4.3 Associated Port for 'ipps' URI
> Scheme, to add note about compatibility for IPP Clients and IPP
> Printers that MUST accept explicit port 443 (assigned in 'https' URI
> scheme [RFC2818]) and process normally, per IEEE-ISTO PWG IPP WG
>> Editorial - Revised section 4.6.1 Examples of 'ipps' URI for
> Printers, to add example of explicit port 443, per IEEE-ISTO PWG IPP
> WG review.
>-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...