[IPP] [PWG5100.20] Issue #36: No test for "LOC" DNS records mandated by 5100.14 section 4.2.2

[IPP] [PWG5100.20] Issue #36: No test for "LOC" DNS records mandated by 5100.14 section 4.2.2

[IPP] [PWG5100.20] Issue #36: No test for "LOC" DNS records mandated by 5100.14 section 4.2.2

Ira McDonald blueroofmusic at gmail.com
Sun May 15 15:23:35 UTC 2016


Hi,

I am strongly opposed to reducing requirements in PWG 5100.14 (or any
other IETF or PWG IPP spec) just because there is not a current test for
the requirement in the self-cert tools.

Cheers,
- Ira


Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG
Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
Secretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG Internet Printing Protocol WG
IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
Blue Roof Music / High North Inc
http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic
http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc
mailto: blueroofmusic at gmail.com
Winter  579 Park Place  Saline, MI  48176  734-944-0094
Summer  PO Box 221  Grand Marais, MI 49839  906-494-2434


On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 1:47 PM, <smith.kennedy at hp.com> wrote:

> [Issue Unconfirmed]
>
> PWG 5100.14 section 4.2.2 requires Printer objects to publish LOC records
> for their service.  But 5100.20 lacks a requirement to test for them.
> (Should we eliminate them from 5100.14 or make them optional?)
>
> Link: http://www.pwg.org/issues/36
>
> _______________________________________________
> ipp mailing list
> ipp at pwg.org
> https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20160515/6d65d696/attachment.html>


More information about the ipp mailing list