Would using "job-constraints-supported" to list the exceptions to "finishings-col-database/ready" be a better match than specifying the feed orientation? That way we are still tying the constraint to the media size/source without exposing the lower-level processing details, and the "job-resolvers-supported" attribute can provide a recommended change, e.g., use tray 2 instead of tray 3.
> On May 23, 2016, at 3:13 PM, Kennedy, Smith (Wireless Architect) <smith.kennedy at hp.com> wrote:
>> This revision of the slide set is now on the FTP site here:
> Smith Kennedy
> Wireless Architect - Client Software - IPG-PPS
> Standards - IEEE ISTO PWG / Bluetooth SIG / Wi-Fi Alliance / NFC Forum / USB IF
> PWG Chair
> HP Inc.
>>>>>>> On 2016-05-17, at 6:16 AM, Kennedy, Smith (Wireless Architect) <smith.kennedy at hp.com> wrote:
>>>> Attached is an updated slide set as per the last IPP WG meeting. Please review before next meeting and reply with feedback via email if possible if there are any glaring issues with the way that I've encoded things. This is a complex problem, which would benefit from broad review.
>>>>>>>>> On 2016-04-28, at 10:24 AM, Kennedy, Smith (Wireless Architect) <smith.kennedy at hp.com> wrote:
>>>>>> I have posted a brief slide set that I will use later today to try to illustrate issue I think needs to be addressed in Finishings 2.1, that concerns managing finishings options based on job orientation and/or feed orientation. It is here:
>>>>>>http://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/slides/Finishings-2.1-Orientation-and-Feed-Orientation-Extensions.pdf>>>>>> I've also updated the meeting page to list this slide deck.
>> ipp mailing list
>>ipp at pwg.org>>https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp>> _______________________________________________
> ipp mailing list
>ipp at pwg.org>https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer