[IPP] Report on CUPS attribute group ordering restrictions

[IPP] Report on CUPS attribute group ordering restrictions

[IPP] Report on CUPS attribute group ordering restrictions

Ira McDonald blueroofmusic at gmail.com
Mon May 15 22:55:23 UTC 2017


Hi Mike,

Bottom line - does that mean it's OK and appropriate to have the System
attributes
group (for System status changes from Printer operations) at the *end*
(last) of the
response attribute groups?

Cheers,
- Ira


Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG
Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
Secretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG Internet Printing Protocol WG
IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
Blue Roof Music / High North Inc
http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic
http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc
mailto: blueroofmusic at gmail.com
Jan-April: 579 Park Place  Saline, MI  48176  734-944-0094
May-Dec: PO Box 221  Grand Marais, MI 49839  906-494-2434


On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 6:13 PM, Michael Sweet <msweet at apple.com> wrote:

> All,
>
> Re: my pending action item:
>
>         Action: Mike to check on group ordering restrictions in CUPS
> (PENDING)
>
> I have the following information to provide:
>
> 1. The CUPS scheduler (cupsd) enforces the RFC 8011 group ordering in IPP
> requests.
>
> 2. The ipptool utility enforces the RFC 8011 group ordering in IPP
> responses.
>
> 3. The CUPS library (libcups) does not enforce the RFC 8011 group ordering
> for requests or responses.
>
>
> _________________________________________________________
> Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer
>
> _______________________________________________
> ipp mailing list
> ipp at pwg.org
> https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20170515/f6ff9326/attachment.html>


More information about the ipp mailing list