[IPP] Canon requests registration of four new IPP media sizes

[IPP] Canon requests registration of four new IPP media sizes

Yardumian, Rick RYardumian at ciis.canon.com
Wed Jun 20 22:20:45 UTC 2018


Hi Mike,

I'm fine with your suggestions. Does anyone else in the PWG have a preference for these media sizes?

Thanks,
Rick

-----Original Message-----
From: msweet at apple.com [mailto:msweet at apple.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2018 6:25 AM
To: Yardumian, Rick
Cc: ipp at pwg.org
Subject: Re: [IPP] Canon requests registration of four new IPP media sizes

After looking at the existing photo entries, maybe the following would be more consistent:

   oe_square-photo_4x4in
   oe_square-photo_5x5in
   om_square-photo_89x89mm

> On Jun 20, 2018, at 8:48 AM, Michael Sweet <msweet at apple.com> wrote:
> 
> Rick,
> 
>> On Jun 18, 2018, at 7:06 PM, Yardumian, Rick <RYardumian at ciis.canon.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Canon requests that the following four new media sizes be registered.
>> -          om_square_5x5in
>> -          oe_square-4x4_4x4in
>> -          om_square89mm_89x89mm
> 
> Given these are photo sizes, how about:
> 
>    oe_photo-square_4x4in
>    oe_photo-square_5x5in
>    om_photo-square_89x89mm
> 
>> -          om_cardsize_55x91mm
> 
> Given this is for business cards, I would suggest:
> 
>    om_business-card_55x91mm
> 
> I have also seen 55x85mm shown as a standard size of business cards in Europe, although that is within 1mm of the credit card size.  In North America we use 2x3.5in...  *If* we added those for completeness we'd have:
> 
>    oe_business-card_2x3.5in (North America)
>    om_business-card_55x85mm (Europe)
>    om_business-card_55x91mm (Japan)
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
>> I have checked the IANA IPP registered media sizes and could not find any size matches so as far as I can tell, these are new media sizes.
>> 
>> The first three “square” sizes are used for photographic printing. The fourth “cardsize” media is used for business cards. Canon understands that the above media names may need to be changed for consistency. All feedback is welcome.
>> 
>> Thank you,
>> Rick Yardumian
>> _______________________________________________
>> ipp mailing list
>> ipp at pwg.org
>> https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp
> 
> _________________________________________________________
> Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ipp mailing list
> ipp at pwg.org
> https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp

_________________________________________________________
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer



More information about the ipp mailing list