Smith,
> On Jul. 17, 2018, at 12:54 PM, Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & Standards Architect) <smith.kennedy at hp.com> wrote:
>> Greetings,
>> I came across a typo in RFC 8011. In section 4.2.2, it says:
> This OPTIONAL operation is identical to the Print-Job operation
> (Section 4.2.1), except that a Client supplies a URI reference to the
> Document data using the "document-uri" (uri) operation attribute (in
> Group 1) rather than including the Document data itself. Before
> returning the response, the Printer MUST validate that the Printer
> supports the retrieval method (e.g., ’http’, ’ftp’, etc.) implied by
> the URI and MUST check for valid URI syntax. If the Client-supplied
> URI scheme is not supported, i.e., the value is not in the Printer’s
> "referenced-uri-scheme-supported" attribute, the Printer MUST reject
> the request and return the ’client-error-uri-scheme-not-supported’
> status-code.
> The "referenced-uri-scheme-supported" in red above should actually be "reference-uri-scheme-supported".
>> How do we file an erratum against RFC 8011?
Go here:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php <https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20180717/b03e1ca5/attachment.html>