[MFD] RE: [IPP] The Proposed PWG Raster

[MFD] RE: [IPP] The Proposed PWG Raster

[MFD] RE: [IPP] The Proposed PWG Raster

Petrie, Glen glen.petrie at eitc.epson.com
Fri Feb 4 01:14:26 UTC 2011

It was proposed only as a check value - it could be dropped  (or use
something like a check sum)



From: Michael Sweet [mailto:msweet at apple.com] 
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 5:12 PM
To: Petrie, Glen
Cc: ipp at pwg.org; cloud at pwg.org; mfd at pwg.org
Subject: Re: [IPP] The Proposed PWG Raster


On Feb 3, 2011, at 12:45 PM, Petrie, Glen wrote:



		Structure and Format of PHRHDR



		[96] --- [99]                    CmpRasterLen
Length in bytes of compressed raster to follow


	This kills streaming...


	[gwp] Oops, this should do after the raster content to entire
the entire raster was received.


How would that help? And what about raster data larger than 4GiB?


Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair


This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/mfd/attachments/20110203/11a177ac/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the mfd mailing list