[MFD] RE: [IPP] The Proposed PWG Raster

[MFD] RE: [IPP] The Proposed PWG Raster

[MFD] RE: [IPP] The Proposed PWG Raster

Petrie, Glen glen.petrie at eitc.epson.com
Fri Feb 4 01:14:26 UTC 2011


It was proposed only as a check value - it could be dropped  (or use
something like a check sum)

 

________________________________

From: Michael Sweet [mailto:msweet at apple.com] 
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 5:12 PM
To: Petrie, Glen
Cc: ipp at pwg.org; cloud at pwg.org; mfd at pwg.org
Subject: Re: [IPP] The Proposed PWG Raster

 

On Feb 3, 2011, at 12:45 PM, Petrie, Glen wrote:

	

		...

		Structure and Format of PHRHDR

		==========================

		... 

		[96] --- [99]                    CmpRasterLen
Length in bytes of compressed raster to follow

	 

	This kills streaming...

	 

	[gwp] Oops, this should do after the raster content to entire
the entire raster was received.

 

How would that help? And what about raster data larger than 4GiB?

 

________________________________________________________________________
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair

 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/mfd/attachments/20110203/11a177ac/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the mfd mailing list