[MFD] RE: Missing semantic text for elements specific to System Object in System Control Service spec

[MFD] RE: Missing semantic text for elements specific to System Object in System Control Service spec

[MFD] RE: Missing semantic text for elements specific to System Object in System Control Service spec

Ira McDonald blueroofmusic at gmail.com
Wed Sep 14 18:06:06 UTC 2011


Hi Pete,

I would prefer to keep the top-level AvailableResources element.

Otherwise, an MFD can only implement Resources if it publishes a
Resource service.  And the System Control Service can't modify
metadata (such as expiration dates) on Resources or query them.

That means no CIM or other translation of PWG SM can expose
the Resource instances.

Cheers,
- Ira

Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG IPP WG
Chair - TCG Embedded Systems Hardcopy SWG
IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
Blue Roof Music/High North Inc
http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic
http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc
mailto:blueroofmusic at gmail.com
Christmas through April:
  579 Park Place  Saline, MI  48176
  734-944-0094
May to Christmas:
  PO Box 221  Grand Marais, MI 49839
  906-494-2434



On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Zehler, Peter <Peter.Zehler at xerox.com>wrote:

> Nancy,****
>
> Responses are inline below.****
>
> Pete****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> Peter Zehler
>
> Xerox Research Center Webster
> Email: Peter.Zehler at Xerox.com
> Voice: (585) 265-8755
> FAX: (585) 265-7441
> US Mail: Peter Zehler
> Xerox Corp.
> 800 Phillips Rd.
> M/S 128-25E
> Webster NY, 14580-9701 ****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Nancy.Chen at okidata.com [mailto:Nancy.Chen at okidata.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 06, 2011 12:40 PM
> *To:* Zehler, Peter
> *Cc:* mfd at pwg.org
> *Subject:* Missing semantic text for elements specific to System Object in
> System Control Service spec****
>
> ** **
>
>
> Hi Pete,
>
> In the System Control Service spec, the following elements are specific to
> the System Object, hence are not defined in MFD Model spec.  Would you
> please add their semantic text ?
>
> in Section 6.2, the text for the following elements are missing in
> SystemDescription: ****
>
>
> AvailableResources
> <PZ>Removed from model.  It was added for the stalled
> ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/new_RES/draft-ietf-ipp-get-resource-00.pdfspecification</PZ>
> ****
>
> DevicesSupported ****
>
> <PZ>Removed due to no clean mapping to PWG5104.2 and lack of PSI support or
> PSI implementations.</PZ>
> ServicesSupported ****
>
> <PZ>Added</PZ>****
>
>
>
> in Section 6.3, the text for the following elements are missing in
> SystemStatus:
>
> ConfiguredServices
>
> <PZ>Added</PZ>
> SystemConfigChangeNumber
> <PZ>Added</PZ>
> SystemHealth
> <PZ>Removed until PWG Hardcopy Device Health Assessment Attributes
> completes Formal Vote</PZ>
> SystemTotals ****
>
> <PZ>Added</PZ>****
>
>
>
> Some of them are already defined in another PWG standard spec, but since
> there is no reference in MFD Model spec, I think it's a good idea to add
> them here.
>
> Thanks,
> -Nancy
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Nancy Chen, PWG Vice-Chair
> Principal Engineer
> Solutions and Technology
> Oki Data
> 2000 Bishops Gate Blvd.
> Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054
> Phone: (856)222-7006****
>
> ** **
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
> _______________________________________________
> mfd mailing list
> mfd at pwg.org
> https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/mfd
>
>

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/mfd/attachments/20110914/8fa112f7/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the mfd mailing list