[MFD] PWG Candidate Standards

[MFD] PWG Candidate Standards

[MFD] PWG Candidate Standards

Petrie, Glen glen.petrie at eitc.epson.com
Mon Oct 3 21:13:12 UTC 2011


I have been doing some detailed work with some of the pwg candidate
standards and, to date, I have noted the following.

 

 

5100.5 has an incorrect table of contents but ok in PDF.

5100.5 still has change information in the word doc

5100.5 Sec: 9.1.13 reference 5100.7 Sec: 4.2.4; there is no 5100.7 Sec:
4.2.4!

            I  believe it should reference 5100.7 Sec: 3.2.5.3
document-source-os-name (name(40))

            5100.7 states the OS name must be lowercase; however, the
IANA 

registry
(http://www.iana.org/assignments/operating-system-names/operating-system
-names.xml)

state the names must be uppercase.

            ???? What is used by PWG ????

 

5100.7 still has change information in the word doc

5100.7 Sec. 3.2.2 reference rfc2911 section 3.1.4.14; I believe the
correction section is 13.1.4.14

 

 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/mfd/attachments/20111003/fefa3f9e/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the mfd mailing list