[MFD] RE: Comments on PWG Print Job Ticket and Associated Capabilities spec

[MFD] RE: Comments on PWG Print Job Ticket and Associated Capabilities spec

[MFD] RE: Comments on PWG Print Job Ticket and Associated Capabilities spec

Nancy.Chen at okidata.com Nancy.Chen at okidata.com
Mon Jan 9 20:45:00 UTC 2012


Hi Pete,

Here is the latest pwg raster spec we just reviewed in IPP concall today : 

ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippraster10-20111202.pdf

On Page 27, Table 9 has the list of elements that need to be added to PWG 
Print Service Description.  "PWGRasterDocumentSheetBack" is listed there, 
which is named "PWGRasterDocumentBackside" in Print Job Ticket spec.

Maybe you were reading a different version of PWG raster spec?

I think we should use the same name.

-Nancy




"Zehler, Peter" <Peter.Zehler at xerox.com> 
01/09/2012 03:07 PM

To
<Nancy.Chen at okidata.com>
cc
<mfd at pwg.org>
Subject
RE: Comments on PWG Print Job Ticket and Associated Capabilities spec





Nancy,

I reworked section 5 a bit to update the section reference and clarify
the container element mapping for your #1 and #2.  I updated Table 3 to
remove Raster requirements from the PJT specification.  I do not
understand your #3.  From my reading the element names in the table are
the same as those in the latest posted Raster spec.  I am using
"PWGRasterDocumentBackside" but I don't see "PWGRasterDocumentSheetBack"
anywhere.

Pete





Peter Zehler

Xerox Research Center Webster
Email: Peter.Zehler at Xerox.com <mailto:Peter.Zehler at Xerox.com>
Voice: (585) 265-8755
FAX: (585) 265-7441
US Mail: Peter Zehler
Xerox Corp.
800 Phillips Rd.
M/S 128-25E
Webster NY, 14580-9701



From: Nancy.Chen at okidata.com [mailto:Nancy.Chen at okidata.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 08, 2012 6:19 PM
To: Zehler, Peter
Cc: mfd at pwg.org
Subject: Comments on PWG Print Job Ticket and Associated Capabilities
spec




Hi Pete,

See my comments below -

1) In Section 5 Print Service Description, the section reference for
"the definition for the PrintServiceCapabilities container element" is
incorrect.

See the following text in the spec:
"
368 A container element is needed to carry the subset of
PrintServiceDescription elements,
369 the PrintJobTicketCapabilities and the PrintDocumentCapabilities in
a protocol.  Section 0
370 contains the definition for the PrintServiceCapabilities container
element.
"

2) the "container element" mentioned above is not defined in the spec.

3) Table 3 - the element "PWGRasterDocumentBackside" came from PWG
Raster Format spec, in Section 5 Semantic Model Elements - Table 9: the
"PWGRasterDocumentSheetBack" element.  Shouldn't this element use the
same name in these two specs????

Regards,
-Nancy
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------
Nancy Chen, PWG Vice-Chair
Principal Engineer
Solutions and Technology
Oki Data
2000 Bishops Gate Blvd.
Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054
Phone: (856)222-7006



-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/mfd/attachments/20120109/193ad134/attachment-0002.html>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/mfd/attachments/20120109/193ad134/attachment.htm>


More information about the mfd mailing list