[MFD] Comments on PWG Print Job Ticket and Associated Capabilities spec

[MFD] Comments on PWG Print Job Ticket and Associated Capabilities spec

[MFD] Comments on PWG Print Job Ticket and Associated Capabilities spec

Michael Sweet msweet at apple.com
Tue Jan 10 00:00:25 UTC 2012


Pete and Nancy,

FWIW, we changed the element name to "PwgRasterDocumentSheetBack" in the last face-to-face review of PWG Raster, so that is the name that should be used throughout.  The original name is no longer used in the PWG Raster spec...


On Jan 9, 2012, at 12:07 PM, Zehler, Peter wrote:

> Nancy,
> I reworked section 5 a bit to update the section reference and clarify the container element mapping for your #1 and #2.  I updated Table 3 to remove Raster requirements from the PJT specification.  I do not understand your #3.  From my reading the element names in the table are the same as those in the latest posted Raster spec.  I am using "PWGRasterDocumentBackside" but I don’t see"PWGRasterDocumentSheetBack" anywhere.
> Pete
>  
>  
> Peter Zehler
> 
> Xerox Research Center Webster
> Email: Peter.Zehler at Xerox.com
> Voice: (585) 265-8755
> FAX: (585) 265-7441
> US Mail: Peter Zehler
> Xerox Corp.
> 800 Phillips Rd.
> M/S 128-25E
> Webster NY, 14580-9701
>  
> From: Nancy.Chen at okidata.com [mailto:Nancy.Chen at okidata.com] 
> Sent: Sunday, January 08, 2012 6:19 PM
> To: Zehler, Peter
> Cc: mfd at pwg.org
> Subject: Comments on PWG Print Job Ticket and Associated Capabilities spec
>  
> 
> Hi Pete, 
> 
> See my comments below - 
> 
> 1) In Section 5 Print Service Description, the section reference for "the definition for the PrintServiceCapabilities container element" is incorrect. 
> 
> See the following text in the spec: 
> " 
> 368 A container element is needed to carry the subset of PrintServiceDescription elements, 
> 369 the PrintJobTicketCapabilities and the PrintDocumentCapabilities in a protocol.  Section 0 
> 370 contains the definition for the PrintServiceCapabilities container element. 
> " 
> 
> 2) the "container element" mentioned above is not defined in the spec. 
> 
> 3) Table 3 - the element "PWGRasterDocumentBackside" came from PWG Raster Format spec, in Section 5 Semantic Model Elements - Table 9: the "PWGRasterDocumentSheetBack" element.  Shouldn't this element use the same name in these two specs???? 
> 
> Regards, 
> -Nancy 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Nancy Chen, PWG Vice-Chair
> Principal Engineer
> Solutions and Technology
> Oki Data
> 2000 Bishops Gate Blvd.
> Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054
> Phone: (856)222-7006
> 
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and 
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is 
> believed to be clean. _______________________________________________
> mfd mailing list
> mfd at pwg.org
> https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/mfd

_________________________________________________________
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/mfd/attachments/20120109/894d7cb5/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the mfd mailing list