[MFD] Should Orientation Requested be ...

[MFD] Should Orientation Requested be ...

[MFD] Should Orientation Requested be ...

Zehler, Peter Peter.Zehler at xerox.com
Thu Feb 2 20:49:22 UTC 2012


Glen, 

It should be required.  All printers MUST apply this attribute to
document formats that don't have a built-in orientation.  Support of
this attribute  is implementation dependent for the for document formats
that do have a built-in orientation.  The standard mechanisms in place
for handling unsupported or conflicting attributes apply.

Pete

 

 

Peter Zehler

Xerox Research Center Webster
Email: Peter.Zehler at Xerox.com <mailto:Peter.Zehler at Xerox.com> 
Voice: (585) 265-8755
FAX: (585) 265-7441
US Mail: Peter Zehler
Xerox Corp.
800 Phillips Rd.
M/S 128-25E
Webster NY, 14580-9701 

 

From: mfd-bounces at pwg.org [mailto:mfd-bounces at pwg.org] On Behalf Of
Petrie, Glen
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 11:14 AM
To: mfd at pwg.org
Subject: [MFD] Should Orientation Requested be ...

 

Pete (others),

 

Should OrientationRequested be Conditionally Required?   A
printer/print-service may not have resourced (memory) to execute
changing a portrait formatted document to a landscape. 

 

I am not even sure, as a Job ticket element, the addition of "Requested"
is correct.   I would think PrintOrientation is more representative of a
job ticket specified item.

 

Glen

 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and 
dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is

believed to be clean. 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/mfd/attachments/20120202/ae215559/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the mfd mailing list