We have namespaces defined for the various versions of released schema and a namespace for use in WS-Discovery for IPP Everywhere. <ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/www/schemas/PWGNamespaceRegistry.pdf>
In a Web Services binding there are URNs for the objects based on the target namespace. As far as I know we do not have URN namespaces for imaging device objects independent of specific protocol binding and version of the PWG Semantic Model schema.
Xerox Research Center Webster
Email: Peter.Zehler at Xerox.com
Voice: (585) 265-8755
FAX: (585) 265-7441
US Mail: Peter Zehler
800 Phillips Rd.
Webster NY, 14580-9701
From: mfd-bounces at pwg.org [mailto:mfd-bounces at pwg.org] On Behalf Of Randy Turner
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 12:29 AM
To: mfd at pwg.org
Subject: [MFD] Namespace for Device Attributes, subsystems, or abstract capabilities
Do we have a common (standard) URN namespace for imaging device "objects" (resources, subsystems, capabilities, services, etc.) ?
I did a quick search of some of the semantic model documents, and didn't see any reference to something like this.
This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
mfd mailing list
mfd at pwg.orghttps://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/mfd
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.