I prefer the "Multi-row per Entry Table" format with table text size the
same as the body text size.
________________________________
From: mfd-bounces at pwg.org [mailto:mfd-bounces at pwg.org] On Behalf Of
William A Wagner
Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2013 1:12 PM
To: mfd at pwg.org
Subject: [MFD] Schema Element Table format for Imaging System Model Spec
The Imaging System Semantics and Model V2 will include and update
information from MFD Common Semantics and Model and the previous
Service specifications. Much of the contents of these documents consists
of showing hierarchical Schema graphics followed by detailed
descriptions of the elements in the diagram. The earlier documents used
three different approaches for these descriptions, as indicated in the
discussion document posted at
ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/mfd/white/table_format_examples.pdf
Each approach had its proponents and detractors. The most common format
was the single row per entry table used in the MFD Common Semantics and
model.
The Imaging System document should use a consistent approach for this
explanation of schema elements. Although difficulty in implementing the
format should be considered, it is also important that the approach be
useful and effective in describing the schema. The three formats are
described to allow a working group consideration and decision, hopefully
by the next Semantic Model WG conference call.
Thanks,
Bill Wagne
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is
believed to be clean.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/mfd/attachments/20130708/63ad98c5/attachment-0002.html>