At 05:45 PM 12/5/96 MST, Harry Lewis <harryl at vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>One other note, I will be moving all of the MIN-ACCESS clauses
>>now in the actual object definitions into the CONFORMANCE section
>>in the next MIB draft.
>>Do ya have 'ta!? The MIB is hard enough to follow already. Moving all the
>TC's to the front made it even harder (have we really reaped any tangible
>benifit from this yet?). My 2 cents is I like having the statement right
>there in the object. I don't have to look it up twice (or 3 times if
>there's a TC associated). Is it a compile concern?
Yes, according to Steve Waldbusser, it won't compile if I leave them where
>>Harry Lewis - IBM Printing Systems