JMP> Re: PWG> Proposed change to the June meeting schedule

JMP> Re: PWG> Proposed change to the June meeting schedule

JMP> Re: PWG> Proposed change to the June meeting schedule

Tom Hastings hastings at cp10.es.xerox.com
Thu Jun 12 21:31:24 EDT 1997


Jay,


You wrote:


>If we can squeeze an evening discussion about SENSE into the mix,
>then great.  But the JMP and PMP groups really need focus right
>now, so let's give it to them.  (pun intended...  ;-)


Why not do SENSE Wed evening, since UPD has been canceled?


And of coures, if PMP does need time on Friday, then they can have some.


Tom


At 14:31 06/12/97 PDT, JK Martin wrote:
>Sheesh, give 'em an inch and they take a bloody mile...   ;-)
>
>Ok, I realize that we'll need more than the usual time for JMP,
>since this is supposed to be the *last* meeting before final
>submission.
>
>We'll start on Thursday nite, then wrap up on Friday by 3:00pm.
>
>At this rate, it looks like SENSE will once again be deferred
>until a future PWG meeting, as everyone will probably be quite
>burnt out, given the IPP and JMP efforts.
>
>	...jay
>
>----- Begin Included Message -----
>
>>From jmp-owner at pwg.org Thu Jun 12 12:17 EDT 1997
>Date: Thu, 12 Jun 1997 09:08:37 PDT
>To: jmp at pwg.org, sense at pwg.org, JK Martin <jkm at underscore.com>
>From: Tom Hastings <hastings at cp10.es.xerox.com>
>Subject: JMP> Re: PWG> Proposed change to the June meeting schedule [JMP ALL
>  DAY FRIDAY, and THUR NITE]
>Cc: pwg at pwg.org
>
>Jay,
>
>I talked with Ron Bergman and we agreed that JMP could use all of
>Friday, up to the usual closing time of 3:00pm EDT. Ron is travelling,
>so he wanted me to convey this message ASAP, since JMP participants
>may need to change their plane reservations.  We see from
>Lloyd's response that PMP doesn't need any time Friday.  We'd also like
>to keep Thursday evening as scheduled as well.
>
>The high level JMP agenda is:
>
>1. Answer any issues that arise between now and the meeting.
>2. Review the current draft (V0.82 = Internet-Draft 01) and resolve
>   any issues.
>3. Review mappings from each job submission protocol to the Job Monitoring
>   MIB for that separate document that we'll produce as an informational
>   RFC.  The review of the mapping will also be helping us with the review
>   of the MIB itself.  I'm sure we'll get lots of "Oh, it that what that
>   attribute means, we need to clarify ...".  In effect, producing and
>   reviewing the mappings from job submission protocols to the Job MIB
>   will be like a "paper backoff".  And I sure would like to clear up
>   ambiguities BEFORE we publish the proposed standard, rather than
>   AFTER.
>
>So we can sure use all the time.
>
>Thanks for your generosity in making it available,
>Tom and Ron
>
>
>At 13:04 06/09/97 PDT, JK Martin wrote:
>>Given the fact that both the Printer MIB (PMP) and Job Monitoring MIB
>>(JMP) projects are in the eleventh hour and are about to "finish", it
>>is probably in the best interests of the PWG to let those groups have
>>priority scheduling at the upcoming June meetings.
>>
>>Therefore (once again), I am willing to give up the Friday meeting
>>slot time for SENSE so that these groups have a chance to actually
>>complete their work at these meetings.
>>
>>Given the large amount of finalization needed for the Job MIB, it
>>could be that the JMP group needs BOTH the Thursday nite meeting
>>slot IN ADDITION TO a Friday slot.
>>
>>As I recall, the PMP group is in much better shape, but it could be
>>that at least 2 hours are needed for this group's final effort.
>>
>>Ron Bergman (JMP chair) and Lloyd Young (PMP chair): would you two
>>please comment on this rescheduling opportunity, stating what your
>>requirements are?  Please respond as soon as possible, as a change
>>in scheduling (either duration or start-time) may affect some
>>participants' travel plans.
>>
>>If we can squeeze an evening discussion about SENSE into the mix,
>>then great.  But the JMP and PMP groups really need focus right
>>now, so let's give it to them.  (pun intended...  ;-)
>>
>>	...jay
>>
>>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>--  JK Martin               |  Email:   jkm at underscore.com          --
>>--  Underscore, Inc.        |  Voice:   (603) 889-7000              --
>>--  41C Sagamore Park Road  |  Fax:     (603) 889-2699              --
>>--  Hudson, NH 03051-4915   |  Web:     http://www.underscore.com   --
>>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>
>At 14:57 06/09/97 PDT, lpyoung at lexmark.com wrote:
>>
>>Jay,
>>Thanks for thinking of us but the Printer MIB does not need any time
>>on the agenda for the June meeting. Everything that is left to be
>>resolved can be resolved via the mailing list.
>>Lloyd Young
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>----- End Included Message -----
>
>
>



More information about the Pwg mailing list